Now, where were we? Let's take a look at that keel:
Contact at the transom end |
Contact at the forward end |
Long gap in the middle |
So, how should we interpret this? Let's take a few things into consideration. I have done far more fairing work at the aft end of the keel than in the area between frames 2 and 4.
At the transom, it's likely that the port side is very, very close to where it needs to be. So, it's not likely that the aft end is a troublesome high point.
Then there's also that problem area at the keel & Frame #2.
Keel at Frame #2 |
So, if the transom end is about right and the center area is close to right, if possibly low; and knowing that less fairing work has been done at the forward end of our measured area... then it's reasonable to conclude that the forward part of the keel around Frame #4 is too high.
The complication is: fairing the depth and angle of the keel in that area is only guesswork until we know that it is correct at a known point. That known point is Frame #4.
However, to use Frame #4 as a reference point for fairing the keel, we first have to make sure Frame #4 itself is correct.
And so far, it's not.
So, that's what I have mostly been working on.
Frame #4 at the chine, and the outer port floor batten |
Middle & inner port floor battens at Frame #4 |
View from the other side |
No comments:
Post a Comment